March 2008 Archives

CERN Complaint Now Available

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Here is the Complaint in the case blogged below seeking too enjoin CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.

            

Ghostbusters-Photograph-C12119601.jpg

         A self-proclaimed cosmic truth seeker with a Ph.D from Berkeley in Biology has filed for an injunction in United States District Court in Hawaii seeking to halt the work on CERN’s Large Haldron Collider in Geneva Switzerland. The plaintiffs, Walter L. Wagner, and his colleague Luis Sancho, believe something bad may happen when the collider is put on line. How bad? Remember when Ghostbuster Dr. Spengler warns it would be bad to cross the beams and Dr. Venkman asks: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"? Dr. Spengler responds: “Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.” That’s how bad.

 Not that the scientists at CERN or elsewhere agree. They are pretty sure the universe and the space-time continuum will not be irreparably harmed even though a few tiny black holes may be generated and some other things never seen since the dawn of time may appear. Other than that ….

             The Collider, the world’s largest, is the result of 14 years work by some of the world’s leading physicists and $8 billion pooled by various governments and foundations. The goal is to propel protons at such speeds that when they collide they will recreate energy and conditions equal to that  which occurred at the moment of the big bang when the universe was one trillionth of a second old. All this information and more is available on CERN's website which explains how safe the project really is and why it is important to conduct such research to unwrap the mysteries of the cosmos.

      Wagner and Sancho, however, are not convinced and believe a federal judge in Hawaii should issue an injunction to preserve the status quo otherwise known as all life as we know it. They are primarily concerned about two phenomena that could be produced by the proton collisions. The first are those miniature black holes.  Wagner thinks they just might begin sucking in all surrounding mass growing unstoppably in size and power like a giant snowball until they engulf the entire Earth and maybe the solar system. Or, even worse,  maybe these black holes could act as spacewarp wormhole portals into alternate universes that could pull us all through a rift in the  fabric of space-time into a parallel universe. Yikes!

        The folks at CERN don’t deny they just might produce these black holes; in fact, they are excited about the prospect. But they point to a 1974 paper by no one less than Stephen Hawking who theorized that such machine generated black holes would quickly and harmlessly evaporate in a burst of radiation. Whew! I feel a lot better, now.

          Of course, Hawking hasn’t written about those other things Wagner is worried about and which some physicists believe might just be produced. These are something called “strangelets,” primordial particles consisting of equal numbers of up, down and strange quarks. Not that I know what a quark is but physicists explain that when these heretofore hypothetical strangelets come into contact with ordinary matter they just might convert ordinary nucleii into strange matter, much the way Ice Nine operated in Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Cat’s Cradle. So within a fairly short period of time every particle on earth just might be converted into dense shrunken strangelets. That would be bad.

          The lawsuit, filed March 21, seeks a temporary restraining order prohibiting CERN  and its sponsors from proceeding with the Collider until they produce a safety report and an environmental impact assessment. In addition to CERN, the defendants are the federal Department of Energy, the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, and the National Science Foundation. A scheduling conference is set for June 16, a few weeks before CERN is scheduled to bring the Collider on line.

Alan Milstein

Not Quite Caesar's Wife

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

        

sumrow.jpgIn 2001, Ray Sumrow was named Prosecutor of the Year in Texas. That is quite a distinction in a state which executes more inmates than all of the other states combined. Earlier this week, Sumrow was convicted by a jury of theft by a public servant, reports the Dallas Morning News, for converting $9,652.76 worth of computer equipment and purported business travel expenses for his personal use.

       "A public official, like Caesar's wife, must be above suspicion," the judge told Sumrow, while sentencing him to four years in prison. The Judge also told Sumrow, who is still facing trial on additional charges, including a claim that $68,000 in government expense money was improperly diverted to his personal account, “I'm sure you sent people to prison for far less than the charges against you."

Alan Milstein

 

         

stock_smoking-tax.jpgConflicts of Interest have risen their ugly head again in human subject research. This time hidden tobacco money appears to have funded a study suggesting that lung scans might help save smokers from cancer and thereby lessen the risks of smoking.

Both the New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA published studies by Weill Cornell Medical College researchers in 2006 without understanding or disclosing that the Liggett Group had provided funding for the study.

The issue of whether such routine scans are worthwhile is a hot topic and a critical public health issue. In fact, the American Cancer Society and numerous other groups have provided funding to the Cornell team to see if routinely screening smokers with CT scans can reveal early signs of lung cancer and prevent deaths.

John Niederhuber, director of the National Cancer Institute issued a statement that scientists must maintain the trust of patients in research studies and "any breach of that trust is not simply disappointing but, I believe, unacceptable."

JAMA’s editor in chief Dr. Catherine DeAngelis  said she contacted Cornell’s lead researcher Dr. Claudia Henschke months ago after learning that the Cornell group held patents related to CT scanning technology which also were not disclosed.  Said Dr. DeAngelis,  "We'd been working with Dr. Henschke trying to get her to write a letter of apology — which is our policy — and to take responsibility. It was not easy to get her to do anything." DeAngelis further said that, had she known big tobacco had funded the research, “ I would have turned down the paper."

Alan Milstein

Lilly Settles With Alaska for $15 Million

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

         

zyprexa.jpgAlaska has settled its lawsuit with Eli Lilly for $15 million. The settlement occurs after two in a series of three closely watched Supreme Court opinions dealing with whether the FDA is the only watchdog the public needs over the drug and device manufacturers. Alaska filed the lawsuit in March 2006 lawsuit alleging the state and healthcare providers were insufficiently warned about possible side effects of Zyprexa, Lilly’s $5 billion bestseller, relating to weight gain, high blood sugar and diabetes, causing harm to the state's Medicaid recipients and increased costs.

          Alaska filed its claim under the state’s  Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act. The trial began on March 6th before a jury and Anchorage Superior Court Judge Mark Rindner. With the jury out of the courtroom, the judge announced that without lawsuits like this one, claims that drugs cause health problems "might well go unaddressed" and that the evidence presented by the state had established that the FDA "isn't capable of policing this matter."

Alan Milstein 

Stern Wants To Raise NBA Minimum To 20

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

lebron.jpg

David Stern has announced his intention to raise the minimum eligibility age for NBA players to 20 years. Stern may not realize that the three players in the race for MVP this year—Kobe Bryant, Kevin Garnett, and Lebron James—all entered the league straight out of high school. Instead, Stern argues the league will improve if the best players in the land sometimes will have to ply their trade for free on the NCAA farm for two years. The facts just don’t support this old argument, however. Our friend and colleague Michael McCann has demonstrated in his article “Illegal Defense: The Irrational Economics of Banning High School Players from the NBA Draft” that NBA players drafted out of high school have for the most part been ideal citizens and superior contributors to their teams. Still Stern plans to ask the player’s union to agree to exclude 18 and 19 year olds from the opportunity to earn a living doing what they do best.

The union hopefully will not give in to Stern's demand. Even if they do, the rule will surely be challenged both in the halls of congress and the halls of justice. Notwithstanding the Second Circuit's ruling in Clarett, such a rule still would unquestionably primarily affect those outside the bargaining unit and concern matters other than wages, hours or conditions of employment, two of the three requirements for protection under the labor exemption to the antitrust laws. Stay tuned. 

Alan Milstein

three.jpgIn Glendale, California, the jury rendered a defense verdict in the malpractice trial over alleged negligence and liability in John Ritter's death. Jurors, who voted 9 to 3 against liability, said they were torn “between sympathy for Ritter's wife and children and their conviction that the doctors were blameless."

The family of John Ritter has sued Burbank's Providence St. Joseph Medical Center and the emergency room physicians charging failure to diagnose and treat the late actor’s rare aortic dissection in timely fashion. Ritter’s family had already received $14 million in settlements and was seeking another $67 million from the emergency room physicians who did not participate in the settlement. This in a state with a $250,000 cap on damages for pain and suffering. That 67 mil is the amount the experts projected Ritter would earn over the remaining course of his career.

Mis-Taken Identity?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

             

mist.jpgThe more things change and the more advanced we are with our technology, the more they remain the same. As long as there is any human component whatsoever to a process, there will always be a margin of error. The Washington Post reports today that a government laptop computer containing sensitive medical information on 2,500 patients enrolled in a
National Institutes of Health study was stolen in February. Yes, February.  

Included in the stolen data was seven years' worth of clinical trial data, including names, medical diagnoses and details of the patients' heart scans. The information was not encrypted, in violation of the government's data-security policy.

NIH officials did not publicly disclose the theft and did not formally, in writing, notify the affected patients of the breach in security until last Thursday -- almost a month later.  NIH officialts said they delayed because of concerns that they would provoke undue alarm. Yeah, ya think?

The Washington Post further reported that this month, the Government Accountability Office found that at least 19 of 24 agencies reviewed had experienced at least one breach that could expose people's personal information to identity theft.

 

John M. Hanamirian

 

      

med mar.jpg

Representative Barney Frank announced he intends to introduce a bill decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana. Whether it has much chance of success is another story, but hopefully the proposal will begin the much needed debate. Frank says his principal motivation is the absurd actions of federal law enforcement in prosecuting those using marijuana for medicinal purposes. Currently thirteen states allow those with cancer or aids or other debilitating illnesses to use marijuana to relieve their pain or nausea or to improve their appetite. The remaining states and the federal government would rather spend resources prosecuting the desperately ill who seek some measure of comfort from this ancient herbal remedy.  

Alan Milstein   

          

starb.jpgA California Superior Court awarded Starbucks Baristas $105 million dollars yesterday in a class action brought over the sharing  of tips.  The case was brought by Jou Chan who worked at Starbucks for a year while in college. Chou and the class alleged that Starbucks required the tip jar be split not just among lowly employees but the supervisor as well. This the court ruled was contrary to California labor law which allows tips to be pooled among workers but not by management. The Judgment will also be pooled and shared, this time by 100,000 former and current employees.

Scooter's Wheels Removed

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

             

scoot.jpg

Lewis “Scooter” Libby has been disbarred by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. In a terse Opinion, the court reasoned that disbarment is mandatory when a member of the bar is convicted of  a crime of moral turpitude and that perjury and  obstruction of justice are each just such a crime. His friend the President, of course, has commuted his sentence because it was disproportionate to the offence, while offering no such comfort to Marion Jones  who sits in prison away from her seven month old because of a similar conviction for perjury.

 

Alan Milstein

               

gun.jpg

Here is a transcript of today’s argument before the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller. From the initial reports of observers at the oral argument, it does not look good for the rational view that gun control is necessary to control gun violence.

 

Alan Milstein

Gun Case Set for Argument

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Tuesday morning at 10 am the Supreme Court will hear argument in D.C. V Heller, the most important gun case to reach the Court in half a century. Here is a link to Scotus Wiki which includes everything you need to know about the case. Most legal scholars see the Court doing the right thing and holding that the Second Amendment does not restrict cities like the District of Columbia from passing tough anti-handgun legislation to control the epidemic of murders in this Country.

Art Caplan On the Ethics of Steroid Use

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

      

steroids_591.jpg
Here is an excellent piece by Arthur Caplan writing in Science Progress about the ethics of steroid use. Art writes:

The battle over performance enhancement is often fought out as if one size fits all—what makes performance enhancement acceptable in one domain, sports, will make it acceptable in all aspects of life. What the fight between Harris and Sandel reveals is that this is not so. There are reasons to believe that steroids don’t belong in sports, even putting safety concerns aside. But this does not mean that performance-enhancing drugs have no appropriate role in any areas of life and achievement. The decision about what role pharmacology and genetics ought to play depends on whether you are trying to travel to another planet, solve a difficult math problem, learn a new language, or hit a home run.

drugtest.jpg

The Ninth Circuit yesterday issued its anxiously awaited Opinion in Lanier v. City of Woodburn, holding that preemployment drug testing violated plaintiff’s privacy rights under the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Oregon Constitution. Lanier had sued the municipal employer, alleging that its policy requiring job applicants to pass pre-employment drug tests was unconstitutional. The 9th Circuit affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff concluding that the policy was unconstitutional as applied to Lanier who had applied for a job as a library page, though the court held the policy was not facially invalid.

The city had argued that it had a substantial and important interest in screening library pages mainly because drug abuse is a serious societal problem and might have an adverse impact on job performance. The court cogently rejected these arguments reasoning that prior decisions of the United States Supreme Court "make clear the need for suspicionless testing must be far more specific and substantial than the generalized existence of a societal problem of the sort that [the employer] has posited." The court noted that the need in suspicionless cases not involving high risk or safety-sensitive tasks must be "special" and not merely "symbolic."

Alan Milstein

 

 

Skittle Me This

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

        

skittles.jpgSending a message of understanding that candy popping addicts are only the victims in the war on calories, the New Haven, Connecticut school district reinstated honors student Michael Sheridan after suspending him and removing him from his elected class post for buying a bag of Skittles candy from a fellow student in violation of the school's policy against empty-calorie food. The Briefcase (Mar. 13) has more, along with a link to this PTO Today article detailing how a federal law mandating school "wellness policies" has increased the pressure on states and local schools to adopt anti-snack measures.

In today's Sacramento Bee, Peter Schrag has an excellent op-ed article titled "The State High Court's Gay Marriage Conundrum."

Elliott Mess

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

es.jpgWhere to begin?
 
Soon to be ex-Governor Elliott Spitzer was caught on federal wiretap in what appears to be an "integrity/public corruption investigation". Apparently, Spitzer was involved in what was described as the high-profile "Emporers Club VIP," which was accused last week of offering prostitutes to wealthy clients, some at $5,500 an hour.

The wiretap transcript with Spitzer and "Lewis" (whom allegedly was an agent of the prostitution service) purportedly reads:

Lewis said that "Kristen" would go directly to room 871.

Client 9 asked Lewis to remind him what "Kristen" looked like and Lewis said that she was American, petite, very pretty brunette, 5 feet 5 inches, and 105 pounds.
Client 9 said that she should go straight to 871, and if for any reason it did not work out, she should call Lewis.


According to the purported transcript, "Client 9" made it apparent to the service's agent that it wasn't the first time he'd used the service. "Yup, same as in the past, no question about it," he said when referring to payment arrangements.

Later, the agent told "Kristen" that the client would "ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe -- you know -- I mean that ... very basic things. ... 'Kristen' responded: 'I have a way of dealing with that. ... I'd be like, listen dude, you really want the sex?' ... You know what I mean.'" 

The Web site of the Emperors Club VIP displays photographs of the prostitutes' bodies, with their faces hidden, along with hourly rates depending on whether the prostitutes were rated with various numbers of diamonds, with seven diamonds being the highest. 

Again, allegedly, the story goes that Client 9 wanted a high-priced prostitute named Kristen to come to Washington on a 5:39 p.m. train from Manhattan. The instructions were that alllegedly, the door to the hotel room would be left ajar and train tickets, cab fare, room service, and the minibar were all on him.

That transportation across state lines created federal jursidiction over the matter because such conduct may be violative of the Mann Act.  Additionally, Spitzer purportedly paid for the prsotitution services through a direct charge to his bank account to a vendor of anonymous origin.  The frequency of those charges and their amount triggered bank officials to notify the Federal government of potentially suspicious activity.


Spitzer said:

"I have acted in a way that violates my obligations to my family and violates my, or any, sense of right and wrong,"  "I have disappointed and failed to live up to the standard I expected of myself."

 

The case is being handled by prosecutors in the Public Corruption unit of the U.S. Attorneys' Office.  This one is going to go on for awhile.


 

John M. Hanamirian 

 

Guinea Pigging for $2000 a Bite

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

        

malaria.jpg

The Seattle Biomedical Research Institute wants to infect healthy human subjects with malaria to test a new vaccine. The Center will be offering $2000 to the human guinea pigs willing to rent their bodies for the greater good. Is it ethical? Depends who you ask. Here is a study with all risk and no benefit to the healthy subjects, other than the two grand, and money is not supposed to count as a benefit. The money is the problem, of course, as it always is. The money is used to induce the needy to be subjects, not for altruism, but for the basic necessities of life or maybe just some spending money. If you doubt that, see if there are any rich folks you know who want to volunteer.

        The researchers seem certain that they can quickly cure anyone infected and that the worst the subjects will experience are some flu like symptoms. Where have we heard that before?

     Stay tuned.

 

Alan Milstein

Hypocrisy Still the Homage Vice Pays to Virtue

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

              

Spitzer_blog_20080310141646.jpgHere is the
Complaint which apparently gave rise to the fall of Governor Spitzer. Before being elected Governor, Spitzer of course was the highest ranking law enforcement officer in the state of New York who twice prosecuted prostitution rings. To say he knew better is an understatement. The governor issued the following statement:

Today, I want to briefly address a private matter. I have acted in a way that violated the obligations to my family and that violates my — or any — sense of right and wrong. I apologize first, and most importantly, to my family. I apologize to the public, whom I promised better. I do not believe that politics in the long run is about individuals. It is about ideas, the public good and doing what is best for the State of New York. But I have disappointed and failed to live up to the standard that I expect of myself. I must now dedicate some time to regain the trust of my family. I will not be taking questions. Thank you very much. I will report back to you in short order. Thank you very much.

 

FDA An Inadequate Check On BigPharma

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

             

hastins.gif Wendy Parmet of the Hastings Center Bioethics Forum has written an excellent article on the recent moves by the Supreme Court to shield device and drug manufacturers from liability.  In
Safety First-Or Safety Preempted, Ms. Parmet writes what many of us know: the FDA has historically done a poor job of protecting consumers and the threat of liability is critical to keeping BigPharma in check.

 

On Saturday, May 31, 2008 from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm Matthew Podolnick and John Lolio, both partners of the law firm Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky, P.A. will be teaching a course on the current status of the law and vital issues surrounding same sex civil unions, domestic partnerships and marriages.  The course will also provide same sex couples with important information related to utilizing estate planning to protect themselves and each other.  The course is sponsored by the William Way LGBT Community Center through its affiliate Way Gay U and will take place at the Center located at 1315 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA.

 

          For more information about how to register for this and other classes at Way Gay U, go to the web site at waygay.org

 

 
hs.jpg
A California Appellate Court  has issued an
opinion holding that parents who lack teaching credentials cannot homeschool their children. The ruling is a blow to the approximately 150,000 California families who educate their children at home outside of the public or private school system.

          The Court ruled “Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children. Parents who fail to [comply with school enrollment laws] may be subject to a criminal complaint against them, found guilty of an infraction, and subject to imposition of fines or an order to complete a parent education and counseling program.”

The New Jersey Legislature unanimously released an important bill out of committee today. The bill requires physicians to obtain informed consent from the parent of a child before prescribing a psychotropic drug containing a Black Box warning issued by the FDA. Testifying before the committee were firm clients Lisa Van Syckel and Laurie Yorke. The bill now goes before the full Senate.

 

rezulin.jpg  

         The Supreme Court issued its second opinion on preemption is as many weeks, this time in Warner Lambert v. Kent, rendering a split 4 to 4 opinion that leaves this critical issue still up for grabs. The case involved Warner-Lambert’s diabetes drug Rezulin, which was pulled from the market in 2000 when it was revealed that it caused liver damage.

        The Court considered a Michigan law that bars lawsuits over drugs approved for sale by the FDA except if the drug company committed fraud during the FDA review process. Who could argue against such an exception? Surely, if the drug company lied to the FDA during the approval process, it should not be able to use FDA approval to shield itself from lawsuits. Well, at least four Justices believed otherwise, holding that the fact that a drug company defrauded the FDA do not give rise to a private cause of action. Even worse, most Court observers believe Chief Justice Roberts would have provided the fifth vote for preemption but he recused himself because he owns stock in Pfizer which now owns Warner Lambert. The split vote leaves intact a Second Circuit decision in favor of the plaintiffs injured by the drug.

     Still another preemption case looms on the horizon, Wyeth vs. Levine, and Roberts unfortunately does not own stock in Wyeth.

Alan Milstein 

            

pharmalot.pngHere is an
article about the work of two clients of the firm and their efforts to protect the children of New Jersey before the state legislature.

More On Clemens

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Here is an interesting article about Clemens published at CNSNews.com.

I was interviewed for my thoughts on the evidence thus far.

 

Alan Milstein

 

wikileaks.jpg

We previously wrote about the dangerous though ineffective injunction a San Francisco federal judge issued shutting down the Wikileaks website. On Friday, the Judge reversed himself, recognizing that his order was an unlawful prior restraint. The Judge said he had  "serious questions" about whether the legal measures sought "would be constitutionally appropriate" and whether they constituted a prior restraint by the government. He also cited "possible violations of the First Amendment." The Judge also said he recognized that “other websites” had posted the purloined documents so there was a real question as to how effective his order was or could ever be.

 

Alan Milstein 

 

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from March 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

February 2008 is the previous archive.

April 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01