Sports Law: March 2008 Archives
The union hopefully will not give in to Stern's demand. Even if they do, the rule will surely be challenged both in the halls of congress and the halls of justice. Notwithstanding the Second Circuit's ruling in Clarett, such a rule still would unquestionably primarily affect those outside the bargaining unit and concern matters other than wages, hours or conditions of employment, two of the three requirements for protection under the labor exemption to the antitrust laws. Stay tuned.
Alan Milstein
Here is an excellent piece by Arthur Caplan writing in Science Progress about the ethics of steroid use. Art writes:
The battle over performance enhancement is often fought out as if one size fits all—what makes performance enhancement acceptable in one domain, sports, will make it acceptable in all aspects of life. What the fight between Harris and Sandel reveals is that this is not so. There are reasons to believe that steroids don’t belong in sports, even putting safety concerns aside. But this does not mean that performance-enhancing drugs have no appropriate role in any areas of life and achievement. The decision about what role pharmacology and genetics ought to play depends on whether you are trying to travel to another planet, solve a difficult math problem, learn a new language, or hit a home run.
Here is an interesting article about Clemens published at CNSNews.com.
I was interviewed for my thoughts on the evidence thus far.
